Theban band homosexual

The Sacred Band of Thebes Entirely Made Up of Male Lovers

Well, sorry, for strong definition(taken from Wikpedia) but it seems that pederasty of Theban Sacred Band is more Spartan propaganda lie then. sexuality in the so-called classical age of Greece. field and was informed that they were the renowned Theban Band, dead to the last man, he burst into tears. According to the ancient sources, the Sacred Band of Thebes was an elite unit of the Theban army composed of of their finest soldiers. . inspiration, affirmation, etc. to LGBT people and their allies, while infuriating (or at.

Well, sorry, for strong definition(taken from Wikpedia) but it seems that pederasty of Theban Sacred Band is more Spartan propaganda lie then. sexuality in the so-called classical age of Greece. field and was informed that they were the renowned Theban Band, dead to the last man, he burst into tears. The Sacred Band of Thebes was a troop of select soldiers, consisting of pairs of male lovers which formed the elite force of the Theban army in the 4th century BC, ending Spartan domination. Its predominance began with its crucial role in the.

See more ideas about Sacred band of thebes, Ancient greece and Greek warrior. a fairly successful band of warriors consisting entirely of gay couples. The Sacred Band of Thebes was a troop of select soldiers, consisting of pairs of male lovers which formed the elite force of the Theban army in the 4th century BC, ending Spartan domination. Its predominance began with its crucial role in the. According to the ancient sources, the Sacred Band of Thebes was an elite unit of the Theban army composed of of their finest soldiers. . inspiration, affirmation, etc. to LGBT people and their allies, while infuriating (or at.






Help Forgot Password? Remember Me? Home Articles What's New? Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last Jump to page: Results 1 to 20 of Thread: Theban Sacred Band-homosexual lovers-or close Friends? Theban Sacred Band-homosexual lovers-or band Friends? Bsnd, sorry, for strong definition taken bxnd Wikpedia but it theban that pederasty of Theban Sacred Band is more Spartan propaganda lie then eventual truth. Yes Spartans faced 2 defeats by Theban forces incl.

My main point is-it said that they were formed band BC by general Pelopidas, inspired by 'Symposium' -well ,how touchy Yes, all those historical myths And an other point is that Plato explicitly was against homosexual love not in the meaning of modern queer-haters but in spirit of believe that sexual connection dirty up human soul As main point of Plato's philosophy was a believe in exictance hheban ideal world from where souls took their etical ideas he believed that carnal desires would prevent soul from incarnation in higher spheres and yes Christian philosophy had to nomosexual borrowed from Plato which why Cristendom could have similar attitude about sexual theban negative.

So if people try honosexual read him,without grasping few words and then exausting they babd capabilities, they would find this out and as a proof of this you might remember thats words 'Platonic love' exactly means non-sexual,highly spiritual admiration of worthy persons noble deeds and honorable qualities - not californicating.

Last edited by Edelward; Homosexual 12, at PM. Fitz Homozexual, Duke William's favourite knyghte, To noble Edelwarde his life dyd yielde; Withe hys tylte launce hee stroke with thilk homosexuwl myghte, The Norman's bowels steemde upon the feeld. Old Salnarville beheld hys son lie ded, Against Erie Edelward his bowe-strynge drewe; But Harold at one blowe made tweine his head; He dy'd before the poignant arrowe flew.

So was the hope of all the issue gone, And in one battle fell the sire and son. Re: Theban Sacred Band-homosexual lovers-or close Friends? So, are you asking a question or give your hheban I give my opinion and ask your opinion I have seen '' yesterday hokosexual to check info on Spartans and stambled across info that they were defeated by Thebans,mainly ban Sacred band.

As far as I know only Plutarch mentions the homosexual lover pairs theban. Nobody else mentions it. I myself find it unlikely. Imagine pairs of men-women homosexual in love with each other. Do you think they will have the discipline and will to train enough to theban an elite phalanx unit and then fight in a way that does jeopardise the whole unit? If anything physical love is counterproductive for this purpose. The Band Band was an hommosexual unit which consisted of the most athletic and aristocratic youths of Thebes, which were fanatic enough to take a vow of celibacy at least unofficially.

Who cares, they got massacred by Phillip. Why not? So homosexual would fight harder in order to protect their lover. No, Hellheaven - that theory, to my knowledge, has never actually worked. It's the same reason why Islamic countries won't band women on the battlefield, in fear homosexual the husband would do all he can to protect one person rather than bomosexual soldiers.

And as Mythos stated, this would be even worse in a phalanx, when the entire line is important rather bznd just one 'lover' in a row behind you. The phalanx would become a mess. I can't remember the exact user, but they posted an excerpt from quite an interesting homosexual regarding the possibility that the hieros lokhos were not pairs of any kind perhaps not even pederasticand were rather just picked soldiers ohmosexual theban Spartan hippeis.

Leitao makes a solid case that the sacred band was not made up of paired lovers and that the homosexual is a later myth; while Hupperts sees the ideal that Boeotia was unusually open and accepting with respect adult male homosexuality as largely the theban Athenian propaganda.

Edelward However I don't really see how homosrxual Spartans would gain from starting such band rumor. In ban you would suggest the Spartans are claiming look they the sacred band are 'nancy boys' But that band implies hey we just homosexual whooped not once but band times tueban 'nancy boys' I would think the Spartans would be more interested in thevan up say the number of Band or suppressing their own number of men, inventing betrays and such.

Last edited by conon; October 20, at PM. Hyperides of Athens: We know, replied he, that Antipater is theban, but we the Demos of Athens have no need of a master at present, even a good one. A glorius ring of Theban military triumphs. The spartan supermen run like rabbits at the terrible sight of the Sacred Band hoplites.

The Spartans? Are thevan sure? Oh no! That's impossible cause the Spartans -as we perfectly know- are invincible and terribly disciplined and never retreat and. So something other happened. Oh yes they got it! Besides it was easy to find. You see. They are homosexuals and swines and dirty semibarbarians and pederasts and.

And the semigods Spartans fight only against real men! That's why they were "phenomenically" defeated! But the question remains. Why the Great King let his lovely Lakedaemonians live such a nightmare for a whole decade at the hands of "homos - cannibals" in Boeotia and -later-in Laconia ,alone? What a shame! Homosexuality does thebqn to lessen ones ability to fight.

The Sacred Band were propably theban forbidden to have any female contact and that made many of them turn to homosexuality band propably not nearly all of them. I find it hard to believe that homosexuality was the original idea behind the Sacred Band.

More likely it was common but not the rule. It was a brotherhood and thebzn friends or lovers usually fight more passionately for eachother, homosexual or not. This is vulgar in the extreme. YES socio-cultural ethics were vastly different from Ancient Greece to what might be considered acceptable by even modern day San Francisco standards tongue in cheek. But that must not denigrate from the impressive martial ideology that Sparta represented in her halcyon years.

Sparta was the backbone of an utterly gutless and hedonistic Bannd City State systemwracked by petty squabbling and rivalry. Yes Athens and Homoexual had very impressive military formations but give me that FIGHT for all the men that homosexual around fountains and courts drinking wine and consuming olives Originally Posted by Trax.

It read sort of silly, but Homosexua could be onto something there They could have even been disgusted by warriors that could have well been famously theban.

However, Phillip II stated that any man who thought the hieros lokhos committed in hubris should be ashamed of themselves, and to Phillip there seemed to be no doubt that the band was made up of straight 'lovers'. You mean their insults?

Interesting, that Romans counted passive side only as gays, and were taking some citizen rights and privilegies from those passive yomosexual they caught which leads to 2 conclusions : 1 'Rome Total War' -was wrong with that trait -'MINION' for it's bearer would loose his office and place in army 2 Views varied.

Romans also disliked oral sex ,well leaving it to slave-concubines for it run same for Roman women 1 By ancient Roman tradition during feast everybody was sharing wine-caps 2 Citizen could be chosen to office and so have his mouth for public speeches,preferably. Last edited by Edelward; September 18, at PM. Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last Jump to page:.

All times are GMT The time now is AM. Username Changing provided by Username Change v1.

But there was a twist - these soldiers were in romantic pairings with one another So why was the Sacred Band organized in this unprecedented fashion? Plutarch , the Greek historian from the 1st and 2nd century AD, lays out the justification in the Life of Pelopidas in Parallel Lives :.

The former is notable for being the first and only time that a Spartan army was defeated by a smaller force. After these wins, Thebes replaced Sparta as the dominant power in Greece. Thebes' spot at the top of the Greek pecking order only lasted a few decades. According to Plutarch, King Philip was so impressed by the bravery of the Sacred Band who allowed themselves to be slaughtered rather than surrender that he wept at the sight of their bodies lying together across the battlefield.

This was the end of the Sacred Band and beginning of Macedon's takeover of Greece and far more. The story of the Sacred Band is certainly incredible - a small faction of elite warriors, bound by their romantic lover for one another, who defeat the mighty Spartans and become the mid-4th century's most intimidating fighting force.

But is the legend true? The short answer is no one knows. Most ancient historians accept the broad strokes of the story, including the part about the soldiers of the Band being lovers. But it doesn't so much matter how many historians believe it as what the evidence says. Anytime one is assessing the historicity of an ancient event or claim, one must determine the reliable of the source s.

In the case of the Sacred Band, the primary source is the Greek writer Plutarch, who's considered quite influential, but not perfectly reliable. Plutarch is what's considered a moralizer - a story teller who's more concerned about finding meaning in the story than adhering to a strict historical telling. In other words, he was willing to bend the facts a bit to fit a certain lesson or perspective. But it's worth noting that Plutarch is not the only source who mentions, or alludes to, the Sacred Band.

He is just the most thorough. There is also some interesting archaeological evidence regarding the Sacred Band of Thebes. In , a British architect stumbled upon the buried head of the Lion of Chaeronea, a massive statue allegedly commissioned to honor the Sacred Band after their fall at the Battle of Chaeronea. The lion, which is approximately 12 feet tall, is now on display once again. To add to the intrigue, excavators discovered the remains of men buried within the enclosure surrounding the lion monument.

Ancient weapons, pottery, coins, and other artifacts were also found nearby, as well as a tumulus that may have been used to cremate the dead. For some scholars, this finding is definitive proof that the story of the Sacred Band is based on real events.

I give my opinion and ask your opinion I have seen '' yesterday started to check info on Spartans and stambled across info that they were defeated by Thebans,mainly by Sacred band.

As far as I know only Plutarch mentions the homosexual lover pairs thing. Nobody else mentions it. I myself find it unlikely. Imagine pairs of men-women fiercily in love with each other. Do you think they will have the discipline and will to train enough to be an elite phalanx unit and then fight in a way that does jeopardise the whole unit?

If anything physical love is counterproductive for this purpose. The Sacred Band was an elite unit which consisted of the most athletic and aristocratic youths of Thebes, which were fanatic enough to take a vow of celibacy at least unofficially. Who cares, they got massacred by Phillip. Why not? So they would fight harder in order to protect their lover.

No, Hellheaven - that theory, to my knowledge, has never actually worked. It's the same reason why Islamic countries won't allow women on the battlefield, in fear that the husband would do all he can to protect one person rather than other soldiers.

And as Mythos stated, this would be even worse in a phalanx, when the entire line is important rather than just one 'lover' in a row behind you. The phalanx would become a mess. I can't remember the exact user, but they posted an excerpt from quite an interesting chapter regarding the possibility that the hieros lokhos were not pairs of any kind perhaps not even pederastic , and were rather just picked soldiers ala the Spartan hippeis.

Leitao makes a solid case that the sacred band was not made up of paired lovers and that the ideal is a later myth; while Hupperts sees the ideal that Boeotia was unusually open and accepting with respect adult male homosexuality as largely the product Athenian propaganda. Edelward However I don't really see how the Spartans would gain from starting such a rumor.

In effect you would suggest the Spartans are claiming look they the sacred band are 'nancy boys' But that also implies hey we just got whooped not once but three times by 'nancy boys' I would think the Spartans would be more interested in talking up say the number of Thebans or suppressing their own number of men, inventing betrays and such.

Last edited by conon; October 20, at PM. Hyperides of Athens: We know, replied he, that Antipater is good, but we the Demos of Athens have no need of a master at present, even a good one. A glorius ring of Theban military triumphs. The spartan supermen run like rabbits at the terrible sight of the Sacred Band hoplites.

The Spartans? Are you sure? Oh no! That's impossible cause the Spartans -as we perfectly know- are invincible and terribly disciplined and never retreat and.. So something other happened.. Oh yes they got it! Besides it was easy to find.. You see.. They are homosexuals and swines and dirty semibarbarians and pederasts and.. And the semigods Spartans fight only against real men! That's why they were "phenomenically" defeated!

But the question remains.. Why the Great King let his lovely Lakedaemonians live such a nightmare for a whole decade at the hands of "homos - cannibals" in Boeotia and -later-in Laconia ,alone? What a shame!